🔗 Share this article

Industry experts have expressed deep doubt regarding bullish statements that American oil giants will quickly commit vast sums of dollars to fix the country's dilapidated energy sector.

Demand for Solid Guarantees

Lacking an absolute assurance of financial backing from the US federal government, experts believe global energy giants to move with significant hesitation.

“It would be hasty to discuss any upcoming plans,” a spokesperson stated this weekend.

The aggressive schedule of under a year and a half has been publicly outlined. Yet, expert analyses suggest a different picture.

A More Realistic Timeline

“It’s probably going to take multiple years for any meaningful recovery in production,” said one energy analyst.

The analysis indicates energy firms would likely spend:

• Initial phase: Sorting through new government and security contracts.
• The second year: Investing in overhaul of facilities.
• Final phase: Being able to boost production.

This suggests an increase of around half a million barrels per day perhaps by late 2028.

Desire Versus Willingness for Investment

There is a key distinction between multinationals’ interest and their readiness to commit substantially.

“In my view their attention is an high score, on a range of ten. However, their readiness is a much lower, because there is a lack of certainty yet.”

Seasoned operators in the region reinforce this sentiment. The expectation is that majors will publicly express enthusiasm while in practice proceeding with extreme caution.

The Vast Price Tag

The financial outlay would be colossal. Research projections suggest that adding between 500,000 and a million bpd would require more than $10 billion in funding over two to three years.

Yet, restoring production to previous levels of around 2.5 million barrels per day could require a massive $80 billion to $90 billion over six or seven years.

The Unanswered Question of Federal Guarantees

The idea of firms being compensated by the US taxpayer has been often mentioned. Nevertheless, concrete details on such a mechanism have not yet been forthcoming.

The absence of a solid plan is the main reason behind the industry's reluctance. Companies seek guarantees against nationalization and the possibility that a different president could refuse any agreement.

“It is essential to be insured against sovereign risk, that we’ve experienced in Venezuela before.”

Therefore, while political confidence runs high, the operational risks suggest a road of slow deliberation for any large-scale financial commitment in the country's energy industry.